The summer of 1992 brought an unprecedented
crisis to the city of Mumbai. The dark rain bearing clouds that
normally gather over the city's skyline from the month of June
eluded the metropolis all together. Mumbaites were trying
everything in their power to please the rain gods – scientific
and religious, natural and supernatural.
It was at this time that
a prestigious daily of Mumbai carried in its front page, the
photograph of a ‘havana’ being performed beside one of the lakes
of Powai in order to bring rains to the city. It was being
performed not by sadhus and so called godmen but by scientists
under the guidance of a certain ‘Rainman of Mumbai’, who claimed
to have learnt the art of cloud seeding form the Israelites.
Silver Iodide was being poured in the fire of the so called 'havana
' hoping, that it will go up in the air and its particles will
provide condensation nuclei for cloud formation and bring
artificial rain to the city.
This incident brings
into focus, the role played by mass media in developing
‘Scientific Temper’ among the people. True, this piece of news
had a sensational value. But all the issues and view points
should have been followed up by the newspaper considering the
probability of any unwanted impression the news piece could
create.
The aim of science
journalism should be not only to raise level of scientific
awareness among the public – but also to help them think
rationally and scientifically. The mass media is an important
vehicle through which public can be made aware as to why they
should not keep taking tetracycline capsules in anticipation of
an epidemic of plague or why it is harmless to remain outdoors
during a total solar eclipse.
Now, the question is,
who will do the needful? Who will lead the crusade? The gap
between the scientists and the common man need to be bridged.
For this, initiative has to be taken by newspaper and magazine
editors to include science stories regularly. Some common
excuses given for the general apathy towards covering science
stories are – ‘science does not sell’ or ‘India is not in the
frontline of scientific research’.
Why should research
institutes scattered all over the country work behind closed
doors? Much of the work going on here will make an Indian proud.
After all, they are thriving on the tax payers' money and this
makes them answerable to the common man. So, the public relation
departments of these institutes, can become more active and
prepare information for press releases on a regular basis. This
will bring success stories of these institutes to lime light.
On the other hand, the
press by giving coverage to such stories, will bring our
scientists down form the ivory tower, much closer to the common
man. In fact, scientist can even achieve stardom. After all, if
we have sports and film stars why not ‘science stars’?
One comment can be made
very safely that the vernacular press does more justices to
‘science’ than the English press. Most Bengali weeklies and
fortnightlies, carry regular columns and quite often they even
have cover stories on scientific topics. I can also say the same
thing about Marathi. In fact, Prof. Jayant Narlikar once told
the author that he writes all his stories and articles in
Marathi and then translates in English.
If the English language press can be a
little more in favour of science, then magazines like Science
Today and Science Age need not close down. The
success and popularity of the T.V. Science magazine ‘Turning
Point’ has demonstrated clearly that science sells. The need of
the hour is to train and motivate young science graduates and
even scientists to disseminate scientific information and help
promote scientific temper through mass media.